image 1
Motoring Contributions

A showcase of independent motoring journalism and automotive travails

Only Worth What Somebody Will Pay

An increasing number of the classifieds I come across on my window-shopping sessions include the phrases "future classic" or "becoming a rare classic" and I can't help but feel sceptical about a few of them. A friend once said "it's only worth what someone will pay for it" and that rings true here. Just because the owner has typed "£3,995" in the price box of the classified, it doesn't mean that's what the vehicle is worth.

Indeed, the reason a lot of supposed classics are rare is that either they break and aren't worth repairing (not a rule I've ever heard applied to an E-Type Jag or '67 Mustang) or, they're rubbish and nobody bought one in the first place.

Maybe part of this is bitterness at having let a few genuine future classics slip by when they were more affordable. I've twice been very close to purchasing tidy Mk1 Golf GTIs for about £2k - whereas now you're looking at twice that just for an average example. Then there are the many German performance-barges I have looked at and decided to go Jap instead. Around 4 years ago I was looking at Merc 190E Cosworths and E34 BMW M5s when they were around the £2-3k mark - before deciding to stick with what I had (which at the time was a UK Rev5 MR2).

My MR2 habit bit again a couple of years ago when I went for my current Turbo instead of an E28 BMW M535i. The guy wanted a little over £2k for it, which at the time I thought was a bit steep (he also took us for a rather enthusiastic demo ride, including the sales line "the engine is really strong - you can redline it all day...not that I do"). If you want a slice of shark-nosed M action these days your budget is more like £5-10k, which makes my balking at a couple of hundred quid look like a rather short sighted decision.

I've got my eye on something I think could genuinely be a future classic at the moment - on previous form, if I don't buy one it will almost certainly see a price increase.

Due to the open-to-interpretation nature of the term "future classic", I have seen it appended to classifieds for anything from Audi 80s to Vauxhall Calibras. Whilst I must have been sufficiently interested in both of those vehicles to look at their respective classified sections, even I wouldn't argue that they're likely to be classics. The term "classic" simply seems to mean that a vehicle has become older and rarer (show me a car that doesn't), rather than being particularly revered or interesting in automotive terms.

This brings me to one of the most optimistic classifieds I have ever seen - having always had a soft spot for MkIV RS1600s, I was browsing the Ford Escort classifieds and came across a 1996 RS2000, priced at £4,475. This car (unsurprisingly still for sale at the time of writing) is described as "Showroom Condition" and "guaranteed to win at any show" - which I must say sets the bar rather low for Ford owner's shows.

This is a car that was widely derided when it was brand new 17 years ago and being "totally original and unmolested" means that you're paying four and a half grand for a car that was rubbish in 1996. Everyone loves a fast Ford - but this one wasn't fast 2 decades ago and 76,000 miles is unlikely to have improved that. I must applaud the seller's ambition - especially in the face of similar RS2000s in the same classifieds section selling for £1500 - and even then it's a niche market.

So the moral of the story, is that the true value of a "future classic" is not decided by the vendor or speculative tagline in a classified - more the amount enthusiasts (if they exist) are willing to pay for it and the relative merits of the vehicle itself.

Regular Features
image
28th June

MR2 Turbo in France

image
31st March

Further money "invested"

image
27th January

Lack of options in the snow

image
6th January 2013

'90s reigns as I introduce the current JT Fleet